LIST GOOGLE ADSENSE HIGH PAYING KEYWORD 2013
Top List of High Paying Keyword (HPK) Google Adsense 2013 :
AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT ATTORNEY ($ 76.57 )
AUTO ACCIDENT ATTORNEY ($ 75.64 )
CAR ACCIDENT LAWYERS ($ 75.17 )
DATA RECOVERY RAID ( $ 73.22)
MOTOR INSURANCE QUOTES ($ 68.61 )
PERSONAL INJURY LAWYER ($ 66.53)
CAR INSURANCE QUOTES ($ 61.03)
ASBESTOS LUNG CANCER ($60.96)
INJURY LAWYERS ($60.79)
PERSONAL INJURY LAW FIRM ($60.56)
ONLINE CRIMINAL JUSTICE DEGREE ($60.4)
CAR INSURANCE COMPANIES ($ 58.66 )
BUSINESS VOIP SOLUTIONS ($ 51.9 )
MESOTHELIOMA LAW FIRM ($ 179.01)
DONATE CAR TO CHARITY CALIFORNIA ($130.25)
DONATE CAR FOR TAX CREDIT ($126.65)
DONATE CARS IN MA ($125.58)
DONATE YOUR CAR SACRAMENTO ($118.20)
HOW TO DONATE A CAR IN CALIFORNIA ($111.21)
SELL ANNUITY PAYMENT ( $ 107.46 )
DONATE YOUR CAR FOR KIDS ($106.01)
ASBESTOS LAWYERS ( $ 105.84 )
STRUCTURED ANNUITY SETTLEMENT ($100.8)
ANNUITY SETTLEMENTS ($ 100.72 )
CAR INSURANCE QUOTES COLORADO ($100.93)
NUNAVUT CULTURE ($99.52)
DAYTON FREIGHT LINES ($99.39)
HARDDRIVE DATA RECOVERY SERVICES ($98.59)
DONATE A CAR IN MARYLAND ($98.51)
MOTOR REPLACEMENTS ($98.43)
CHEAP DOMAIN REGISTRATION HOSTING ($98.39)
DONATING A CAR IN MARYLAND ($98.20)
DONATE CARS ILLINOIS ($98.13)
CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEYS FLORIDA ($98.07)
BEST CRIMINAL LAWYER IN ARIZONA ($97.93)
CAR INSURANCE QUOTES UTAH ($97.92)
LIFE INSURANCE CO LINCOLN ($97.07)
HOLLAND MICHIGAN COLLEGE ($95.74)
ONLINE MOTOR INSURANCE QUOTES ($95.73)
ONLINE COLLEDGES ($95.65)
PAPERPORT PROMOTIONAL CODE ($95.13)
ONLINECLASSES ($95.06)
WORLD TRADE CENTER FOOTAGE ($95.02)
MASSAGE SCHOOL DALLAS TEXAS ($94.90)
PSYCHIC FOR FREE ($94.61)
DONATE OLD CARS TO CHARITY ($94.55)
LOW CREDIT LINE CREDIT CARDS ($94.49)
DALLAS MESOTHELIOMA ATTORNEYS ($94.33)
CAR INSURANCE QUOTES MN ($94.29)
DONATE YOUR CAR FOR MONEY ($94.01)
CHEAP AUTO INSURANCE IN VA ($93.84)
MET AUTO ($93.70)
FORENSICS ONLINE COURSE ($93.51)
HOME PHONE INTERNET BUNDLE ($93.32)
DONATING USED CARS TO CHARITY ($93.17)
PHD IN COUNSELING EDUCATION ($92.99)
NEUSON ($92.89)
CAR INSURANCE QUOTES PA ($92.88)
ROYALTY FREE IMAGES STOCK ($92.76)
CAR INSURANCE IN SOUTH DAKOTA ($92.72)
EMAIL BULK SERVICE ($92.55)
WEBEX COSTS ($92.38)
CHEAP CAR INSURANCE FOR LADIES ($92.23)
CHEAP CAR INSURANCE IN VIRGINIA ($92.03)
REGISTER FREE DOMAINS ($92.03)
BETTER CONFERENCING CALLS ($91.44)
FUTURISTIC ARCHITECTURE ($91.44)
MORTGAGE ADVISER ($91.29)
CAR DONATE ($ 88.26 )
VIRTUAL DATA ROOMS ($ 83.18 )
Google Adsense High Paying Keyword 2013 List - If you are looking for HPK or high paying keyword for Adsense, here is top list Adsense HPK 2013. Now it’s time to increase your AdSense revenue.The secret of boosting AdSense earning is High Paying Keywords, actually these keywords helps you to increase your Adsense CPC(Cost Per Click).As a result of increasing CPC(Cost per Click) you will get a huge amount of money from One Click On Google Ads.Actually sometime Google Ads Cost became to high i.e may be up-to 5$ per Click.The secret behind these earning is high paying keywords,so in this regard we have collected some Google Adsense High Paying Keyword,which will certainly increase your AdSense daily earning.
That’s all the best Google Adsense High Paying Keyword 2013 List to boost your earning ! But remember don,t use keywords which are not related to the blog Niche,however you can use the keywords which are related to your Blog/Website Niche,that will surely help you to boost AdSense earning. Increase Adsense Earning by using these Keywords,but don,t use these keywords with the irrelevant blog niche. Happy Blogging.
Tags :adsense 2013,best paying adsense keywords,best keywords for adsense,adsense keywords,high pay adsense keywords,best paying keywords,top paying keyword adsense,keyword high paying,high paying google keywords,paying google adsense keywords,google keyword adsense,paying keywords for adsense,adsense high paying keywords,highest paying adsense keyword,adsense highest paying keywords,what is adsense,how does adsense work,make money with adsense,adsense top paying keyword,best keywords for adsense,adsense keywords,high paying adsense,how does adsense work,making money with adsense.
Home » Archive for June 2013
Shanghai booster Fang Xinghai lands Beijing financial advisory role
Fang Xinghai, former head of the Shanghai Financial Services Office, who once famously downplayed Hong Kong's importance as a financial hub, has been named a senior official at the Office of the Central Leading Group for Financial and Economic Affairs, sources close to the leadership said.
The team worked for the central committee of the Communist Party and was in charge of all vital financial and macroeconomic matters, the sources said.
Premier Li Keqiang directly oversees this low-profile, Beijing-based group, whose main responsibilities include making and advising on key economic decisions and drafting the working agenda of the Central Economic Work Conference, the most important annual economic policy meeting in the country. While Fang's elevation signals the leadership's eagerness to draw younger local officials to Beijing's top policymaking circles, it may also make officials in Hong Kong uneasy.
At the 2011 Asian Financial Forum in Hong Kong, Fang said the speed with which Hong Kong became a successful offshore yuan centre would depend on how soon Shanghai could turn itself into an onshore yuan trading centre. The statement, signalling a subordinate role for Hong Kong in the future, triggered concerns among Hong Kong officials and bankers.
One of the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Fang wrote a letter to President Xi Jinping during the National People's Congress meeting this year to express his interest to "serve the country's financial industry development better at the national level", and Xi quickly forwarded it to the central group in charge of financial and economic affairs.
Fang and Xi briefly worked together in Shanghai when Xi was appointed the city's party chief in 2007.
Fang landed the promotion soon after.
Han Zheng , Shanghai's party chief, supported the promotion and hosted a small farewell dinner for Fang.
"At the farewell dinner, Han praised Fang's achievements during his time in Shanghai and asked him to continue to support the city's financial development in his new role," said one of the sources.
Fang, who obtained his PhD in economics from Stanford University, took the helm of the Shanghai Financial Services Office in 2007 and has been deputy general manager of the Shanghai Stock Exchange.
The Shanghai Financial Services Office declined to comment on Fang's promotion.
In 1998, when he had just turned 30, he was invited by Zhou Xiaochuan , then head of China Construction Bank, to return to China.
At that time he was in the US, where he worked for several organisations, including the World Bank after graduation.
Despite Fang's personal ties with powerful officials and bankers in Beijing, including Zhou, now the central bank governor, he has had his share of brushes with red tape in trying to push forward his various initiatives.
His new role could save him the trouble of clearing bureaucratic hurdles at every step and allow him to get his views and plans across to the top echelons more easily.
SOURCHE.....
Related Posts:
Thomas Penfield Jackson, federal judge,dies at 76
Thomas Penfield Jackson, an outspoken federal judge who sent D.C. Mayor Marion S. Barry to prison for smoking crack cocaine and who declared Microsoft a monopoly that needed to be broken apart, died June 15 at his home in the Compton community of St. Mary’s County. He was 76.He had cancer, his wife, Pat Jackson, said.
Judge Jackson, a native Washingtonian, ruled on many high-profile cases during his 22 years on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and became known for his blunt assessments of the lawyers, jurors and defendants who came before him.
The Microsoft trial was called the most important antitrust case before a U.S. court since the Standard Oil breakup of 1911. The landmark case stretched 18 months, from 1998 to 2000, when Judge Jackson ultimately issued his ruling that Microsoft used monopolistic power to violate three antitrust provisions.
Beefy and six feet tall, Judge Jackson spoke in a deep, booming baritone and was a commanding courtroom presence. Observers noted that the judge quickly grasped the complex technical issues of the Microsoft case, but as the trial dragged on, his impatience became palpable.
Reporters noted that Judge Jackson rolled his eyes or scowled at statements by Microsoft’s attorneys and laughed during videotaped testimony by company co-founder Bill Gates. At other times during the proceedings, he appeared to yawn or nod off.
Judge Jackson issued his decision in April 2000, decreeing that Microsoft should be separated into two companies. Soon afterward, he stirred even greater controversy with a series of interviews in which he compared the computer software giant to a street gang and described Gates as “Napoleonic.”
It was rare — even unheard of — for a sitting judge to discuss his cases in such an unvarnished manner.
In reviewing Judge Jackson’s decision in 2001, a federal appeals court overturned his order that Microsoft should be broken up, but it sustained his primary ruling that the company acted as a monopoly.
But the appeals court wasn’t done. After addressing the legal issues, the judges issued a startling and sharply worded rebuke of Judge Jackson’s behavior in the case, charging him with “egregious” violations of judicial ethical standards.
More>>>
Judge Jackson, a native Washingtonian, ruled on many high-profile cases during his 22 years on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia and became known for his blunt assessments of the lawyers, jurors and defendants who came before him.
The Microsoft trial was called the most important antitrust case before a U.S. court since the Standard Oil breakup of 1911. The landmark case stretched 18 months, from 1998 to 2000, when Judge Jackson ultimately issued his ruling that Microsoft used monopolistic power to violate three antitrust provisions.
Beefy and six feet tall, Judge Jackson spoke in a deep, booming baritone and was a commanding courtroom presence. Observers noted that the judge quickly grasped the complex technical issues of the Microsoft case, but as the trial dragged on, his impatience became palpable.
Reporters noted that Judge Jackson rolled his eyes or scowled at statements by Microsoft’s attorneys and laughed during videotaped testimony by company co-founder Bill Gates. At other times during the proceedings, he appeared to yawn or nod off.
Judge Jackson issued his decision in April 2000, decreeing that Microsoft should be separated into two companies. Soon afterward, he stirred even greater controversy with a series of interviews in which he compared the computer software giant to a street gang and described Gates as “Napoleonic.”
It was rare — even unheard of — for a sitting judge to discuss his cases in such an unvarnished manner.
In reviewing Judge Jackson’s decision in 2001, a federal appeals court overturned his order that Microsoft should be broken up, but it sustained his primary ruling that the company acted as a monopoly.
But the appeals court wasn’t done. After addressing the legal issues, the judges issued a startling and sharply worded rebuke of Judge Jackson’s behavior in the case, charging him with “egregious” violations of judicial ethical standards.
More>>>
Related Posts:
U.S. surveillance architecture includes collection of revealing Internet, phone metadata
On March 12, 2004, acting attorney general James B. Comey and the Justice Department’s top leadership reached the brink of resignation over electronic surveillance orders that they believed to be illegal.
President George W. Bush backed down, halting secret foreign-
intelligence-gathering operations that had crossed into domestic terrain. That morning marked the beginning of the end of STELLARWIND, the cover name for a set of four surveillance programs that brought Americans and American territory within the domain of the National Security Agency for the first time in decades. It was also a prelude to new legal structures that allowed Bush and then President Obama to reproduce each of those programs and expand their reach.
What exactly STELLARWIND did has never been disclosed in an unclassified form. Which parts of it did Comey approve? Which did he shut down? What became of the programs when the crisis passed and Comey, now Obama’s expected nominee for FBI director, returned to private life?
Authoritative new answers to those questions, drawing upon a classified NSA history of STELLARWIND and interviews with high-ranking intelligence officials, offer the clearest map yet of the Bush-era programs and the NSA’s contemporary U.S. operations.
STELLARWIND was succeeded by four major lines of intelligence collection in the territorial United States, together capable of spanning the full range of modern telecommunications, according to the interviews and documents.
More>>>
President George W. Bush backed down, halting secret foreign-
intelligence-gathering operations that had crossed into domestic terrain. That morning marked the beginning of the end of STELLARWIND, the cover name for a set of four surveillance programs that brought Americans and American territory within the domain of the National Security Agency for the first time in decades. It was also a prelude to new legal structures that allowed Bush and then President Obama to reproduce each of those programs and expand their reach.
What exactly STELLARWIND did has never been disclosed in an unclassified form. Which parts of it did Comey approve? Which did he shut down? What became of the programs when the crisis passed and Comey, now Obama’s expected nominee for FBI director, returned to private life?
Authoritative new answers to those questions, drawing upon a classified NSA history of STELLARWIND and interviews with high-ranking intelligence officials, offer the clearest map yet of the Bush-era programs and the NSA’s contemporary U.S. operations.
STELLARWIND was succeeded by four major lines of intelligence collection in the territorial United States, together capable of spanning the full range of modern telecommunications, according to the interviews and documents.
More>>>
Related Posts:
Google details how it hands over data to federal officials
When faced with a court order, the tech giant said, it uses surprisingly simple and low-tech methods, including the delivery of information by hand or by using relatively common techniques to transfer files from one computer to another.
“When required to comply with these requests, we deliver that information to the U.S. government — generally through secure FTP transfers and in person,” Google said in a statement.
That could include putting data onto a memory disk or external hard drive, or printing out the requested information for a federal official, Google said. FTP, or file transfer protocol, is a popular method for exchanging information between servers with an extra layer of security.
The company’s disclosure of how it handles National Security Agency requests might skirt its obligations to keep data requests secret, experts said. So far in public, the company has fiercely maintained that it has never heard of a secret NSA Internet surveillance program called PRISM, first revealed last week by The Washington Post and the Guardian newspapers.
Those outlets reported on an NSA document that showed the agency has been tapping directly into the servers of nine major U.S. Internet companies in order to track foreign terrorism suspects.
Immediately after PRISM was publicly reported, Google, Facebook, Yahoo, Microsoft and others denied giving the government “direct access” to their servers.
Since then, The Post has reported that executives at some of the participating Silicon Valley companies, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, have acknowledged the program’s existence. According to a NSA inspector general’s report obtained by The Post, PRISM allowed “collection managers [to send] content tasking instructions directly to equipment installed at company-controlled locations” rather than directly to company servers.
Cybersecurity experts said the news reports put Google and other tech companies in a difficult position because they might not be able to discuss dealings with the NSA.
“I think that the tech companies want to assure the American people that they are playing a role blocking excessive demands for their information,” said Susan Freiwald, a professor of cyber-law and information privacy at the University of San Francisco.
Google, Facebook, Microsoft and Yahoo this week called for the Justice Department to remove gag orders that prevent them from discussing orders under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. They fear that the secrecy of their involvement in government surveillance requests leads the public to imagine the worst, said Freiwald.
Revelations about Google’s participation are particularly bruising for a firm that has been touted for protecting users’ data.
On Wednesday, Google elaborated on what it is not allowing the government to do.
It says it does not allow the NSA to collect information through a secure portal nor does it put information into a “drop box” for government agents to access. It said it has a team of employees who review every FISA order.
“The US government does not have the ability to pull that data directly from our servers or network,” the Google statement said.
Some technology law experts scoffed at Google’s claims of delivering information by hand. While the government seems to employ various ways of obtaining data, it appears to seek a large amount of information in a format that is searchable, which suggests that its collection from Google, Facebook and others is vast, these experts said.
Officials and former staffers at the tech companies said it would be difficult for the government to place equipment on their servers or directly access them in secret. Too many engineers would know, they say.
“There is obviously a big disconnect between how the NSA is marketing this capability internally and how different companies respond,” said Alan Davidson, a former director of public policy at Google. “Less secrecy would help everyone.”
Sourche
Related Posts:
FDA, facing cybersecurity threats,tightens medical-device standards
The Food and Drug Administration is tightening standards for a wide range of medical devices-from fetal monitors used in hospitals to pacemakers implanted in people-because of escalating concerns that the gadgets are vulnerable to cybersecurity breaches that could harm patiens.
Increasingly, officials said,computer viruses and other malware are infecting equipment such as hospital computers used to view X-rays and CT scans as well as devices in cardiac catheterization labs.The security breaches cause the equipment to slow down or shut off entirely, complicating patient care. As more devices operate on computer systems that are connected to each other, the hospital network and the Internet, the potential for problems rises dramatically, they said.
“Over the last year, we’ve seen an uptick that has increased our concern,” said William Maisel, deputy director of science and chief scientist at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “The type and breadth of incidents has increased.” He said officials used to hear about problems only once or twice a year, but “now we’re hearing about them weekly or monthly.”
The FDA, in an effort to reduce the risks, for the first time is directing device manufacturers to explicitly spell out how they will address cybersecurity. On Thursday, the agency issued draft guidelines that, when finalized later this year, will allow the agency to block approval of devices if manufacturers don’t provide adequate plans for protecting the gadgets and updating their security protections over their commercial lifetimes. The FDA is also issuing a safety communication to manufacturers and hospitals.
The Department of Homeland Security, which is working with the FDA to reduce these vulnerabilities, recently received reports from two researchers that found potential weaknesses in 300 medical devices produced by about 50 vendors, an official said. The department also is planning to release an advisory on medical devices Thursday.
Government officials and patient safety advocates say they do not know of any cases in which patients have been directly injured because of a device compromised by a computer virus. And there is no evidence any implantable devices have been corrupted by viruses or other malware. Nor is there evidence that hackers have deliberately targeted a hospital network or medical device for malicious cyberattacks.
Still, experts say, hospitals and device manufacturers need to use multiple defenses to guard against the threats posed by the Internet.
“There’s almost no medical device that doesn’t have a network jack on the back,” said John Halamka, chief information officer at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “To fight the evils of the Internet, not only do you have to have a moat, you have to have a drawbridge, burning oil to pour on attackers, and guys with arrows.”
Hospitals use thousands of medical devices, including ventilators that help patients breathe, monitors that measure a patient’s vital signs, and pumps that deliver medicine. Implantable devices include pacemakers, insulin pumps and defibrillators, many of which can be remotely monitored through a wireless network, making them susceptible to hacking.
Sourche
Increasingly, officials said,computer viruses and other malware are infecting equipment such as hospital computers used to view X-rays and CT scans as well as devices in cardiac catheterization labs.The security breaches cause the equipment to slow down or shut off entirely, complicating patient care. As more devices operate on computer systems that are connected to each other, the hospital network and the Internet, the potential for problems rises dramatically, they said.
“Over the last year, we’ve seen an uptick that has increased our concern,” said William Maisel, deputy director of science and chief scientist at the FDA’s Center for Devices and Radiological Health. “The type and breadth of incidents has increased.” He said officials used to hear about problems only once or twice a year, but “now we’re hearing about them weekly or monthly.”
The FDA, in an effort to reduce the risks, for the first time is directing device manufacturers to explicitly spell out how they will address cybersecurity. On Thursday, the agency issued draft guidelines that, when finalized later this year, will allow the agency to block approval of devices if manufacturers don’t provide adequate plans for protecting the gadgets and updating their security protections over their commercial lifetimes. The FDA is also issuing a safety communication to manufacturers and hospitals.
The Department of Homeland Security, which is working with the FDA to reduce these vulnerabilities, recently received reports from two researchers that found potential weaknesses in 300 medical devices produced by about 50 vendors, an official said. The department also is planning to release an advisory on medical devices Thursday.
Still, experts say, hospitals and device manufacturers need to use multiple defenses to guard against the threats posed by the Internet.
“There’s almost no medical device that doesn’t have a network jack on the back,” said John Halamka, chief information officer at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. “To fight the evils of the Internet, not only do you have to have a moat, you have to have a drawbridge, burning oil to pour on attackers, and guys with arrows.”
Hospitals use thousands of medical devices, including ventilators that help patients breathe, monitors that measure a patient’s vital signs, and pumps that deliver medicine. Implantable devices include pacemakers, insulin pumps and defibrillators, many of which can be remotely monitored through a wireless network, making them susceptible to hacking.
Sourche
Related Posts:
Chad Johnson sentenced to 30 days in jail after slapping lawyer's butt
Chad Johnson sentenced to 30 days in jail after slapping lawyer's butt
Former NFL wide receiver Chad Johnson picked the wrong time and the wrong place for a joke. Johnson was ordered to spend 30 days in jail after slapping his lawyer on the backside Monday during a South Florida hearing on his probation violation. Johnson 39. lawyer was close to completing a deal that would have kept Johnson out of jail after he violated terms of his probation stemming from a domestic incident in which he head-butted his then-wife, Evelyn Lozada, last summer. Read full articleRelated Posts:
Tested the First Tablet 8 Inch with Windows 8
Quick tablets measuring 7-8 inches proved popular with models such as the Google Nexus 7, Amazon Kindle Fire, and Apple iPad Mini that sells. However, during this new choice available from the Android and iOS platforms.
Well, Windows-based tablets apparently did not want to linger behind the trend. At the exhibition Computex 2013 in Taiwan a few days ago, Acer became the first gadget manufacturer that has a Windows 8 tablet in the form of an 8-inch Iconia W3
Interestingly, Iconia W3 which has 8.1-inch landscape display equipped with the desktop version of Windows 8, not RT, so it can run standard Windows applications. As to whether this device? The following brief review of a review KompasTekno at the exhibition site.
Lightweight and thin
W3 Iconia main attraction of course is the more petite size compared to devices other Windows 8 tablets carrying the average screen size of 8 inches.
The measure seems to provide an appropriate compromise in terms of wear comfort and usability. With a weight of 540 grams, the Iconia W3 can easily be held with one hand without making sore quickly.
W3 Iconia thickness slightly less than 12 mm may make it lean as similar devices such as the iPad Mini, but this deficiency paid by a row of input / output ports are relatively complete for the size of a tablet concise.
W3 Iconia provided with an internal memory of 32GB or 64 GB. Users can still add that amount through micro-SD card slot are also available.
In terms of material quality, the plastic material used for the Acer tablet feels solid enough, though not luxurious material impact aluminum metal in some specific types of tablets.
Other attraction of the Iconia W3 is the operating system used, where Acer pick up the desktop version of Windows 8 tablet is able to run standard Windows applications, such as Windows RT is not used in some ARM based tablets. Windows desktop appearance can also be accessed on the tablet.
Related Posts:
TAUFIK KIEMAS DIED IN SINGAPORE
TAUFIK KIEMAS |
"On behalf of the nation, government, and personal as I say condolences on the death of the father who deeply Taufiq Kiemas. Hopefully can live quiet late Lord Almighty appropriate deeds, struggle, and devotion to the nation," said President kediamananya seconds at a press conference at Puri Cikeas, Bogor, on Saturday (06/08/2013) night.
Before the press conference, the President called for close coordination of joint ranks obsequies Taufiq Week (09/06/2013) tomorrow. Menkopolhukam present Djoko Suyanto, Minister of State Secretary Sudi Silalahi, Head of General Police (Pol) Pradopo East, and other high offices.
President admitted that he had received information critical Taufiq Kiemas at the National University Hospital of Singapore since the day before. Since then, the president continues to communicate with the family in Singapore. President pleaded continue pray for the best for Taufiq.
"Weelll complete what can be assisted by the state. Upon hearing the news that the deceased had died, then immediately the system work. Associated offices do the steps that need to be done. Communications continues we drive to the present. When we close, communication with family in Singapore we continue to do, "the president said.
Related Posts:
Daniel Ellsberg: ‘I’m sure that President Obama would have sought a life sentence in my case’
In 1971, an American military analyst named Daniel Ellsberg gave a New York Times reporter a copy of “United States – Vietnam Relations, 1945–1967: A Study Prepared by the Department of Defense,” a multi-volume work that became known as the Pentagon Papers. The massive, classified study painted a candid and unflattering portrait of the military’s conduct of the Vietnam War. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s request for an injunction against its publication later that year in a 6-3 ruling.
Ellsberg became the first person prosecuted under the 1917 Espionage Act for releasing classified information to the public. But the case was thrown out after the judge learned that the government had engaged in the illegal wiretapping of Ellsberg and other misconduct.
Today, Ellsberg is one of the most outspoken critics of the Obama administration’s prosecution of leakers. Under President Obama’s tenure, the government has prosecuted six individuals for releasing classified information to media organizations.
Ellsberg is particularly fierce in his support of Bradley Manning, a young soldier who released a large amount of classified information to WikiLeaks. Manning was arrested in 2010, and his military court-martial began this week. Ellsberg considers Manning a hero, and he argues that there is little difference between what Manning did in 2010 and what Ellsberg did four decades earlier. We spoke by phone on Friday.
MORE.....
Ellsberg became the first person prosecuted under the 1917 Espionage Act for releasing classified information to the public. But the case was thrown out after the judge learned that the government had engaged in the illegal wiretapping of Ellsberg and other misconduct.
Today, Ellsberg is one of the most outspoken critics of the Obama administration’s prosecution of leakers. Under President Obama’s tenure, the government has prosecuted six individuals for releasing classified information to media organizations.
Ellsberg is particularly fierce in his support of Bradley Manning, a young soldier who released a large amount of classified information to WikiLeaks. Manning was arrested in 2010, and his military court-martial began this week. Ellsberg considers Manning a hero, and he argues that there is little difference between what Manning did in 2010 and what Ellsberg did four decades earlier. We spoke by phone on Friday.
MORE.....
Related Posts:
UK couple thanks Jaya for swift action to rescue them
Chennai Police came in for praise by Tamil Nadu chief minister J Jayalalithaa for successfully rescuing a kidnapped British couple, who called on her and conveyed their gratitude. British nationals Thavaraja (59) and his wife Salaja (55), originally from Sri Lanka and settled in London, called on Jayalalithaa and extended their gratitude for taking necessary action to rescue them, an official release said.
The couple, who had come to Tamil Nadu on a nine-day pilgrimage tour, were abducted on May 29 from the airport by a gang which demanded a ransom of Rs 2.58 crore. Acting on a complaint, city police in a co-ordinated effort with Metropolitan Police
"Congratulations. We are all very proud of you", she said.
(Scotland Yard), London, rescued the couple on June 2 and arrested nine persons, including two Sri Lankans for allegedly abducting them. Lauding the police for their swift action, Jayalalithaa said, "I have always maintained that the Tamil Nadu Police is the best police force in the whole of India and equal to London's Scotland Yard and you have proved it now by your performance."
The couple, who had come to Tamil Nadu on a nine-day pilgrimage tour, were abducted on May 29 from the airport by a gang which demanded a ransom of Rs 2.58 crore. Acting on a complaint, city police in a co-ordinated effort with Metropolitan Police
"Congratulations. We are all very proud of you", she said.
(Scotland Yard), London, rescued the couple on June 2 and arrested nine persons, including two Sri Lankans for allegedly abducting them. Lauding the police for their swift action, Jayalalithaa said, "I have always maintained that the Tamil Nadu Police is the best police force in the whole of India and equal to London's Scotland Yard and you have proved it now by your performance."
Related Posts:
U.S., Germany, Italy commit to training roles in post-2014 Afghanistan
The United States has agreed to lead a training mission in Afghanistan after 2014 that will include troops from Germany and Italy and will operate under a new NATO mandate, officials announced Wednesday.
U.S. troops would be based in hubs in the east and south, Taliban strongholds where the Afghan army is likely to face a deadly insurgency for years to come. Germany has pledged to keep troops in the north and Italy in the west, an arrangement that would mark a continuation of the current force structure, albeit with far fewer troops.
Officials did not specify how many troops the mission, called Resolute Support, would include. They declined to say whether it would include a counterterrorism mission, one of the capabilities the Obama administration has expressed interest in keeping after the mandate of NATO’s current troop contingent, the International Security Assistance Force, expires.
“The new mission will not be ISAF by another name,” NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. “It will be significantly smaller.”
Rasmussen said Turkey is considering keeping troops in Kabul but has not made a definitive pledge. There was no mention of a role for British troops, which have been the second-largest troop contributor of the war.
The White House has been reluctant to specify how many troops it would be willing to keep in the country because it has yet to sign a security cooperation agreement with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. That has made U.S. allies reluctant to make their own commitments to keep on pouring money and troops into a deeply unpopular conflict.
After meeting with his counterparts from allied nations at NATO, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told reporters that the United States has an “unwavering commitment to the future of Afghanistan.”
“We’re transitioning, not leaving,” Hagel said.
The NATO chief said international trainers would advise only at the highest levels, no longer at the brigade and battalion level. That suggested Afghanistan’s fledgling army will do without the critical capabilities the international community has provided, including the ability to carry out aerial medical evacuations.
U.S. military officials say the Afghan army is unmistakably in the lead, taking heavy casualties. In a recent two-week period, more than 200 Afghan forces were killed in fighting, the top commander of NATO troops in Afghanistan, Gen. Joseph Dunford, said this week. Despite the bloodshed, NATO officials say it is time to shift the burden.
“Ultimately, it is for the Afghans to determine their own future,” Rasmussen said. “That is what transition is all about.”
Rasmussen and Hagel said international support for Afghanistan after 2014 is contingent on responsible behavior by the government in Kabul, a clear message to Karzai, who has been a prickly and often unpredictable ally.
“Commitment is a two-way street,” Rasmussen said. “We also expect the Afghan government to live up to its obligations, including full respect for basic democratic principles and human rights.”
Hagel said a “free and fair election” in Afghanistan would be an “essential part of any future commitment.”
U.S. troops would be based in hubs in the east and south, Taliban strongholds where the Afghan army is likely to face a deadly insurgency for years to come. Germany has pledged to keep troops in the north and Italy in the west, an arrangement that would mark a continuation of the current force structure, albeit with far fewer troops.
Officials did not specify how many troops the mission, called Resolute Support, would include. They declined to say whether it would include a counterterrorism mission, one of the capabilities the Obama administration has expressed interest in keeping after the mandate of NATO’s current troop contingent, the International Security Assistance Force, expires.
“The new mission will not be ISAF by another name,” NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said. “It will be significantly smaller.”
Rasmussen said Turkey is considering keeping troops in Kabul but has not made a definitive pledge. There was no mention of a role for British troops, which have been the second-largest troop contributor of the war.
The White House has been reluctant to specify how many troops it would be willing to keep in the country because it has yet to sign a security cooperation agreement with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. That has made U.S. allies reluctant to make their own commitments to keep on pouring money and troops into a deeply unpopular conflict.
After meeting with his counterparts from allied nations at NATO, Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel told reporters that the United States has an “unwavering commitment to the future of Afghanistan.”
“We’re transitioning, not leaving,” Hagel said.
The NATO chief said international trainers would advise only at the highest levels, no longer at the brigade and battalion level. That suggested Afghanistan’s fledgling army will do without the critical capabilities the international community has provided, including the ability to carry out aerial medical evacuations.
U.S. military officials say the Afghan army is unmistakably in the lead, taking heavy casualties. In a recent two-week period, more than 200 Afghan forces were killed in fighting, the top commander of NATO troops in Afghanistan, Gen. Joseph Dunford, said this week. Despite the bloodshed, NATO officials say it is time to shift the burden.
“Ultimately, it is for the Afghans to determine their own future,” Rasmussen said. “That is what transition is all about.”
Rasmussen and Hagel said international support for Afghanistan after 2014 is contingent on responsible behavior by the government in Kabul, a clear message to Karzai, who has been a prickly and often unpredictable ally.
“Commitment is a two-way street,” Rasmussen said. “We also expect the Afghan government to live up to its obligations, including full respect for basic democratic principles and human rights.”
Hagel said a “free and fair election” in Afghanistan would be an “essential part of any future commitment.”
Related Posts:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)